An Coimisiún Pleanála · PL29S.248241 · Planning Appeal
77 Charleville Close, Rear of 149 Leinster Road, Dublin 6
Received by the Commission 23 Mar 2017We first saw it 11 Sept 2026, 23:29
Judicial review window closes 9 Nov 2017 closed 3255 days ago
8 weeks from the Commission's decision (14 Sept 2017) · s.50 Planning and Development Act 2000
Case facts
Demolition of the existing garage and for construction of a two storey (plus attic) house, car parking and all associated works. (Protected Structure)
- Planning authority
- Dublin City Council
- Council reference
- 4451/16
- Council decision
- —
- Commission decision
- Granted with conditions 14 Sept 2017
- Inspector's recommendation
- Assessment ....................................................................................................... 11 8.0 Recommendation............................................................................................... 14 9.0 Reasons and Considerations ................................Error! Bookmark not defined. 10.0 Conditions ................................................................................................... 14 PL 29S 248241 Inspector’s Report Page
Timeline
- 23 Mar 2017Appeal received by ACP
- 14 Sept 2017Appeal decidedJr window closed 9 Nov 2017
Documents
Links go to pleanala.ie. We keep working copies for indexing only and do not serve them.
Matched passages full-text search
- Assessment ....................................................................................................... 11 8.0 Recommendation............................................................................................... 14 9.0 Reasons and Considerations ................................Error! Bookmark not defined. 10.0 Conditions ................................................................................................... 14 PL 29S 248241 Inspector’s Report Page
- following wording is recommended in the Appeal, “The front and rear building line of the dwelling PL 29S 248241 Inspector’s Report Page
- design, height, materials, and height, subject to the implementation of the recommended 2.5 metre setback from the proposed front building line would acceptable…pattern and character of development of the area it PL 29S 248241 Inspector’s Report Page
Provenance
Case row from the Commission's open-data feed (Cases 2016 onwards), fetched 11 Sept 2026, 23:29. Appeal counts on this site use the Commission's own case register, not NOAC or OPR totals.
Source: acp · fetched 11 Sept 2026, 23:29
| Source | Licence | Fetched | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| acp | CC-BY-4.0 | 11 Sept 2026, 23:29 | open |