Planning Register
An Coimisiún Pleanála · PL06D.313282 · Planning Appeal

Tinnahinch and Larch Grove on Plunkett Avenue, Westminster Road, Foxrock, Dublin 18, D18 F8C4 & D18 K2F8. Site area 0.986 ha. (ACA)

Received by the Commission 11 Apr 2022We first saw it 11 Sept 2026, 15:23
Judicial review window closes 22 Jan 2024 closed 964 days ago
8 weeks from the Commission's decision (17 Nov 2023) · s.50 Planning and Development Act 2000

Case facts

Permission for the construction of a residential development comprising of the construction of 99 no. residential units in 3 no. blocks, landscaping, drainage, substation and all ancillary site works.

Planning authority
Dún Laoghaire-Rathdown County Council
Council reference
D22A/0035
Council decision
Refuse permission 15 Mar 2022
Commission decision
Refused 17 Nov 2023
Inspector's recommendation
Assessment ............................................................................. 54 EIA Screening ............................................................................................. 58 8.0 Recommendation............................................................................................... 60 9.0 Reasons and Considerations ............................................................................. 60 10.0 Conditions ................................................................................................... 61 ABP 313282-22 Inspector’s Report Page

Timeline

  • 19 Jan 2022
    Application received by the council
  • 15 Mar 2022
    Council decisionRefuse permission
  • 11 Apr 2022
    Appeal received by ACP
  • 17 Nov 2023
    Appeal decided
    Jr window closed 22 Jan 2024

Documents

Links go to pleanala.ie. We keep working copies for indexing only and do not serve them.

Matched passages full-text search

  • Assessment ............................................................................. 54 EIA Screening ............................................................................................. 58 8.0 Recommendation............................................................................................... 60 9.0 Reasons and Considerations ............................................................................. 60 10.0 Conditions ................................................................................................... 61 ABP 313282-22 Inspector’s Report Page
    inspector_report 313282 (p. 4/72) — https://www.pleanala.ie/anbordpleanala/media/abp/cases/reports/313/r313282.pdf
  • transport patterns. Its reduction is recommended. I consider that this can be addressed by way of condition. ABP 313282-22 Inspector’s Report Page
    inspector_report 313282 (p. 52/72) — https://www.pleanala.ie/anbordpleanala/media/abp/cases/reports/313/r313282.pdf
  • retained within the site, the developer shall implement all the recommendations pertaining to tree retention, tree protection and tree works, as detailed…works. All works on retained trees shall comply with proper ABP 313282-22 Inspector’s Report Page
    inspector_report 313282 (p. 64/72) — https://www.pleanala.ie/anbordpleanala/media/abp/cases/reports/313/r313282.pdf
  • should be pursued. A refusal of permission for 3 no. reasons recommended. 3.2.2. Other Technical Reports Conservation Officer in a report dated 22/02/22 states…with mature planting allowing glimpses of the dwellings. The scale, ABP 313282-22 Inspector’s Report Page
    inspector_report 313282 (p. 9/72) — https://www.pleanala.ie/anbordpleanala/media/abp/cases/reports/313/r313282.pdf

Provenance

Case row from the Commission's open-data feed (Cases 2016 onwards), fetched 11 Sept 2026, 15:23. Appeal counts on this site use the Commission's own case register, not NOAC or OPR totals.

Source: acp · fetched 11 Sept 2026, 15:23
SourceLicenceFetchedLink
acpCC-BY-4.011 Sept 2026, 15:23open