An Coimisiún Pleanála · PL29S.320811 · Planning Appeal
18 Lansdowne Road, Ballsbridge, Dublin 4, D04 E5C3
Received by the Commission 13 Sept 2024We first saw it 11 Sept 2026, 23:29
Judicial review window closes 18 Mar 2025 closed 557 days ago
8 weeks from the Commission's decision (20 Jan 2025) · s.50 Planning and Development Act 2000
Case facts
PROTECTED STRUCTURE: The development will consist of the provision of off-street car parking with 1 EV charging point, accessed by a gated entrance from Lansdowne Road and includes alterations to and refurbishment of front wall, retention of gate posts and all associated site works.
- Planning authority
- Dublin City Council
- Council reference
- 3930/24
- Council decision
- Refuse permission 21 Aug 2024
- Commission decision
- Refused 20 Jan 2025
- Inspector's recommendation
- recommendation to grant permission, the Board had regard to the recommendation of the local authority in particular did not agree that parking for other…Judicial Review. The current appeal relating to Reference 320811-24 is not a mechanism for challenging the previous decision, but does purport to provide
Timeline
- 28 Jun 2024Application received by the council
- 21 Aug 2024Council decision — Refuse permission
- 13 Sept 2024Appeal received by ACP
- 20 Jan 2025Appeal decidedJr window closed 18 Mar 2025
Documents
Links go to pleanala.ie. We keep working copies for indexing only and do not serve them.
Matched passages full-text search
- recommendation to grant permission, the Board had regard to the recommendation of the local authority in particular did not agree that parking for other…Judicial Review. The current appeal relating to Reference 320811-24 is not a mechanism for challenging the previous decision, but does purport to provide
- other plans or projects on a European site. 3.0 Recommendation I recommend that permission for the development be refused. 4.0 Reason 1 The proposed…which seeks to retain on-street parking. 23 ABP 320811-24 Inspector’s Report
- event that the Board decides that permission may be granted, I recommend the insertion of Conditions requiring that all works be carried out under…professional judgement in an improper or inappropriate way. 24 ABP 320811-24 Inspector’s Report
- Conservation Section recommends refusal for reason relating to the removal of part of the boundary wall, and alteration/enlargement of the pedestrian gate opening, which…Development Plan and the Architectural Heritage Protection Guidelines 2011. 13 ABP 320811-24 Inspector’s Report
Provenance
Case row from the Commission's open-data feed (Cases 2016 onwards), fetched 11 Sept 2026, 23:29. Appeal counts on this site use the Commission's own case register, not NOAC or OPR totals.
Source: acp · fetched 11 Sept 2026, 23:29
| Source | Licence | Fetched | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| acp | CC-BY-4.0 | 11 Sept 2026, 23:29 | open |