PlanningRegister.ie
An Coimisiún Pleanála · PL06S.322602 · Planning Appeal

33 Pinewood Park, Rathfarnham, Dublin 14, D14XV29

The development to be retained consists: granted on appeal 17 Sept 2025.

Received by the Commission 23 May 2025We first saw it 11 Sept 2026, 23:29
Judicial review window closes 12 Nov 2025 closed 358 days ago
8 weeks from the Commission's decision (17 Sept 2025) · s.50 Planning and Development Act 2000

Case facts

The development to be retained consists of an existing pedestrian access gate

Planning authority
South Dublin County Council
Council reference
SD25B/0130W
Council decision
Refuse permission for retention 30 Apr 2025
Commission decision
Granted with conditions 17 Sept 2025
Inspector's recommendation
Screening ..................................................................................................... 16 9.0 Recommendation............................................................................................... 16 ABP- 322602-25 Inspector’s Report Page

Timeline

  • 12 Mar 2025
    Application received by the council
  • 30 Apr 2025
    Council decision — Refuse permission for retention
  • 23 May 2025
    Appeal received by ACP
  • 17 Sept 2025
    Appeal decided
    Jr window closed 12 Nov 2025

Documents

Links go to pleanala.ie. We keep working copies for indexing only and do not serve them.

Matched passages full-text search

  • Screening ..................................................................................................... 16 9.0 Recommendation............................................................................................... 16 ABP- 322602-25 Inspector’s Report Page
    inspector_report 322602 (p. 3/19) — https://www.pleanala.ie/anbordpleanala/media/abp/cases/reports/322/r322602.pdf
  • immediate vicinity. The Planning authority concurred with the Road’s Dept recommendation. • The site is not located within a Green Infrastructure (GI) Corridor…significant loss of any grassland or permeable surfaces. ABP- 322602-25 Inspector’s Report Page
    inspector_report 322602 (p. 6/19) — https://www.pleanala.ie/anbordpleanala/media/abp/cases/reports/322/r322602.pdf
  • projects. Appropriate Assessment, therefore, is not required. 9.0 Recommendation I recommend that retention permission be granted for the pedestrian gate based on the below…traffic safety hazard and would not conflict with the ABP- 322602-25 Inspector’s Report Page
    inspector_report 322602 (p. 16/19) — https://www.pleanala.ie/anbordpleanala/media/abp/cases/reports/322/r322602.pdf

Provenance

Case row from the Commission's open-data feed (Cases 2016 onwards), fetched 11 Sept 2026, 23:29. Appeal counts on this site use the Commission's own case register, not NOAC or OPR totals.

Source: An Coimisiún Pleanála cases (ArcGIS feed) · fetched 11 Sept 2026, 23:29
SourceLicenceFetchedLink
An Coimisiún Pleanála cases (ArcGIS feed)CC BY 4.011 Sept 2026, 23:29open