An Coimisiún Pleanála · PL06S.322602 · Planning Appeal
33 Pinewood Park, Rathfarnham, Dublin 14, D14XV29
The development to be retained consists: granted on appeal 17 Sept 2025.
Received by the Commission 23 May 2025We first saw it 11 Sept 2026, 23:29
Judicial review window closes 12 Nov 2025 closed 358 days ago
8 weeks from the Commission's decision (17 Sept 2025) · s.50 Planning and Development Act 2000
Case facts
The development to be retained consists of an existing pedestrian access gate
- Planning authority
- South Dublin County Council
- Council reference
- SD25B/0130W
- Council decision
- Refuse permission for retention 30 Apr 2025
- Commission decision
- Granted with conditions 17 Sept 2025
- Inspector's recommendation
- Screening ..................................................................................................... 16 9.0 Recommendation............................................................................................... 16 ABP- 322602-25 Inspector’s Report Page
Timeline
- 12 Mar 2025Application received by the council
- 30 Apr 2025Council decision — Refuse permission for retention
- 23 May 2025Appeal received by ACP
- 17 Sept 2025Appeal decidedJr window closed 12 Nov 2025
Documents
Links go to pleanala.ie. We keep working copies for indexing only and do not serve them.
Matched passages full-text search
- Screening ..................................................................................................... 16 9.0 Recommendation............................................................................................... 16 ABP- 322602-25 Inspector’s Report Page
- immediate vicinity. The Planning authority concurred with the Road’s Dept recommendation. • The site is not located within a Green Infrastructure (GI) Corridor…significant loss of any grassland or permeable surfaces. ABP- 322602-25 Inspector’s Report Page
- projects. Appropriate Assessment, therefore, is not required. 9.0 Recommendation I recommend that retention permission be granted for the pedestrian gate based on the below…traffic safety hazard and would not conflict with the ABP- 322602-25 Inspector’s Report Page
Provenance
Case row from the Commission's open-data feed (Cases 2016 onwards), fetched 11 Sept 2026, 23:29. Appeal counts on this site use the Commission's own case register, not NOAC or OPR totals.
Source: An Coimisiún Pleanála cases (ArcGIS feed) · fetched 11 Sept 2026, 23:29
| Source | Licence | Fetched | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| An Coimisiún Pleanála cases (ArcGIS feed) | CC BY 4.0 | 11 Sept 2026, 23:29 | open |