PlanningRegister.ie
An Coimisiún Pleanála · PL29N.323159 · Planning Appeal

Unit 3, The Goulding, Santry Cross, Ballymun, Dublin 9, D09 C792

Change of use from retail to gaming/amusement: refused on appeal 11 Nov 2025.

Received by the Commission 29 Jul 2025We first saw it 11 Sept 2026, 23:29
Judicial review window closes 15 Jan 2026 closed 294 days ago
8 weeks from the Commission's decision (11 Nov 2025) · s.50 Planning and Development Act 2000

Case facts

Change of use from retail to gaming/amusement arcade with ancillary works.

Planning authority
Dublin City Council
Council reference
WEB2036/25
Council decision
—
Commission decision
Refused 11 Nov 2025
Inspector's recommendation
Recommendation ..................................................................................... 23 12.0 Reasons and Considerations ................................................................... 23 13.0 Conditions ................................................................................................ 23 Appendix A: Form 1 EIA Pre-Screening ........................................................... 25 ACP 323159-25 Inspector’s Report

Timeline

  • 29 Jul 2025
    Appeal received by ACP
  • 11 Nov 2025
    Appeal decided
    Jr window closed 15 Jan 2026

Documents

Links go to pleanala.ie. We keep working copies for indexing only and do not serve them.

Matched passages full-text search

  • Recommendation ..................................................................................... 23 12.0 Reasons and Considerations ................................................................... 23 13.0 Conditions ................................................................................................ 23 Appendix A: Form 1 EIA Pre-Screening ........................................................... 25 ACP 323159-25 Inspector’s Report
    inspector_report 323159 (p. 3/26) — https://www.pleanala.ie/anbordpleanala/media/abp/cases/reports/323/r323159.pdf
  • objectives and consequently can be excluded from further assessment. 11.0 Recommendation That planning permission be refused for the reasons and considerations set out below…Urban Village’ the subject site is located in proximity to ACP 323159-25 Inspector’s Report Page
    inspector_report 323159 (p. 23/26) — https://www.pleanala.ie/anbordpleanala/media/abp/cases/reports/323/r323159.pdf
  • site servicing issues raised by Transportation Planning Division as refusal is recommended.  Considers that significant effects are not likely to arise, either alone…significant effects and the need for EIA can be excluded. ACP 323159-25 Inspector’s Report Page
    inspector_report 323159 (p. 5/26) — https://www.pleanala.ie/anbordpleanala/media/abp/cases/reports/323/r323159.pdf

Provenance

Case row from the Commission's open-data feed (Cases 2016 onwards), fetched 11 Sept 2026, 23:29. Appeal counts on this site use the Commission's own case register, not NOAC or OPR totals.

Source: An Coimisiún Pleanála cases (ArcGIS feed) · fetched 11 Sept 2026, 23:29
SourceLicenceFetchedLink
An Coimisiún Pleanála cases (ArcGIS feed)CC BY 4.011 Sept 2026, 23:29open